From owner-freebsd-small Sun Mar 11 15:40:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from rues.amursk.ru (rues.amursk.ru [194.85.113.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8A837B718 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:40:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chief@ogk.vympel.amursk.ru) Received: from ogk.vympel.amursk.ru (IDENT:root@ogk.vympel.amursk.ru [213.59.139.2]) by rues.amursk.ru (8.9.3/rv-01alpha1) with ESMTP id JAA21634 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:39:21 +1000 Posted-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:39:21 +1000 Received: from localhost (chief@localhost) by ogk.vympel.amursk.ru (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f2BNcSO03824 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:38:35 +1000 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:38:28 +1000 (VLAT) From: Vladimir Zakharov To: freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 386DX-40 with 8 Mb RAM In-Reply-To: <200103112043.VAA78518@info.iet.unipi.it> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > i was referring to the fact that the new script and picobsd tree > structure in 4.3 is way more flexible to use. Suffices to say > that you can have your config made of as little as 2-3 files > and all in your own directory, and the build products do not > anymore clutter /usr/src/release/picobsd Thanks Luigi, Yes, it can be more flexible and so on but the only lack of ee editor in 3.0 based Pico drives me insane. Above all the hardware limits do matter so I'd better relay on good old 2.2.5R :) Am I wrong? Vladimir To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message