From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 4 22:20:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F54E16A400 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl.gustavsson@bahnhofbredband.se) Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D5613C44B for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carl.gustavsson@bahnhofbredband.se) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BD914D838; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:56:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bdBDJFWJztea; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sleipner.home.swe (c213-100-49-190.swipnet.se [213.100.49.190]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790A914D7E8; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <463BAD4C.2060205@bahnhofbredband.se> Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 00:01:48 +0200 From: Carl Johan Gustavsson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070422) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <18292.1178286106@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <18292.1178286106@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST] if_gem patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 22:20:24 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Can somebody with if_gem hardware please verify that this patch: > http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/if_gem.patch > does not result in any functional difference ? > > I've tested the patch on a Sun Blade 100 (on a few days old CURRENT). There are no problems that I've seen so far. I haven't done any heavy testing though, some iperf tests and ssh transfers. The NIC in the machine is this gem0@pci0:12:1: class=0x020000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x1101108e rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Sun Microsystems' device = 'RIO GEM' class = network subclass = ethernet / cjg