Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 19:46:04 -0500 From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Seagate vs Quantum.. opinions? Message-ID: <199908270046.TAA26012@nospam.hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> of "Wed, 25 Aug 1999 22:53:59 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9908252250570.198-100000@semuta.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Jacob writes: > IBM drives are okay, but like a lot of IBM stuff, sometimes do things > gratuitously different. Speaking of which, "camcontrol defects -f block" and every other variation of "camcontrol defects" fails to list the bad blocks on my IBM drives. # camcontrol defects -f block error reading defect list: Input/output error # tail /var/log/messages Aug 26 19:40:22 nospam /kernel: (pass2:ncr0:0:0:0): extraneous data discarded. Aug 26 19:40:22 nospam /kernel: (pass2:ncr0:0:0:0): COMMAND FAILED (9 80) @0xc0a84400. Aug 26 19:40:22 nospam /kernel: (pass2:ncr0:0:0:0): extraneous data discarded. Aug 26 19:40:22 nospam /kernel: (pass2:ncr0:0:0:0): COMMAND FAILED (9 80) @0xc0a84400. Similar messages when using Adaptec SCSI cards. Has this been addressed in newer -stable, or -current? Am running -stable as of June 13. Have mentioned this problem before. Guess I should send-pr? -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908270046.TAA26012>