From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 21:05:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0F116A400 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4209B43D48 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:05:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 5008B312F6; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:05:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:05:24 -0500 (EST) From: Ensel Sharon To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20060314181302.GA40425@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: do known issues exist when snapshots used with quotas ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 21:05:25 -0000 On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:10:27AM -0800, Arne Woerner wrote: > > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Ensel Sharon wrote: > > > > them) - just the quick question: are there any known issues / > > > > suspicions / hunches / lore about bad things happening when > > > > snapshots are combined with quotas ? > > > > > > Yes - I've even posted as such on this very list in the past few > > > days, so I don't know why you're asking again. > > > > > Hmm... > > > > When was it? I just found some messages (mostly about not further > > specified bugs) > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-March/author.html > > > > But nothing about quota... > > > > Would be astonishing if snapshots have side effects on > > quota-feature-use, I think... > > Since in 6.0 a) snapshots have bugs, and b) quotas have bugs, it > should be hardly surprising to you that snapshots have bugs with > quotas. I did not see any mention of quotas in the previous several days discussion, but I am happy to know about it now. What I _did see_ was: > Thanks. There is an uncommitted patch being circulated that is > believed to address all remaining problems. It relies on other fixes > in -CURRENT that are not yet merged, but if you're able to test it let > me know and I'll forward. does this ^^^ patch also deal with the quota issues ? Will this patch be in 6.1-RELEASE ? Thanka lot.