From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 17:32:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361EF106564A; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23598FC0C; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59580290498; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:32:15 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: dC1lz88pDgy7e966gzTr2K06+iShbubYwMWXoLb34id/ 1234287135 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 028DD38DA5; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:32:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4991BA1C.4020209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:12 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090126) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Smith References: <200902101511.n1AFBQXx096922@svn.freebsd.org> <9bbcef730902100717x1cd1118bg1d2683a42a25232@mail.gmail.com> <1234279584.65150.13.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <1234279584.65150.13.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Ivan Voras , Ken Smith Subject: Re: svn commit: r188439 - head/release X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:32:16 -0000 I'd argue -j2 is appropriate, given that it is reasonable to assume most of the user base still have uniprocessor systems. I have only one dual-core box, and -j2 will still cause at least one make(1) child process to run at any given time on each core -- it seems like the right compromise.