From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  9 18:29:29 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F73106566C
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  9 Jul 2012 18:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.214.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3918FC1D
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  9 Jul 2012 18:29:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so5736715bkc.13
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=CAy11maFoR1pIz+/UH1lvV4b0g9I+eEEiSy6mnFQ9sE=;
	b=bTXiFf6Qbtq0tsJbM2nxU7HLayRbWRKkN3HMZhV1KwFxb27s2KoC7FeEEOA2eWNlsU
	imw8muEAnj9+fnysphHtG0GM0MJ9SRCXtBhytkWYlz3uRcO4Kofp6mMk8a0bXO4Xzzdi
	eTUeLWP9PjDwpuTQrpQM5JiIteYP9NZHXdGIzH8fMihso4s1F3Tp5U/MQdf3ukPnuNuy
	+geQUy0mdN3iM1ywNg95Ldlw/+mA0PnNhu1eEXsdTJdeNcZ7O4cTh/1uDrMD6IXUJuzp
	Ff3+ZITQsif+5CU1F+0BiyhzWpxzyNXYj3AxgJ6HN0AygU5Aw3mzPlwYYviKBSGxbOcF
	MT8w==
Received: by 10.204.148.72 with SMTP id o8mr3672516bkv.103.1341858567929; Mon,
	09 Jul 2012 11:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: utisoft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.204.49.87 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <op.wg6p18uh34t2sn@tech304>
References: <CA+QLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net>
	<4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org>
	<4FF9ECB5.5090507@FreeBSD.org> <863951nrpy.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<op.wg6p18uh34t2sn@tech304>
From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 19:28:57 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: e5esZXyfB5ssDb_DIGMXRuXx_ug
Message-ID: <CADLo839ZwYs+T5DbKDu0OyEK6889ixzc+bUUhN5TPfZxiEa02w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:29:29 -0000

On 9 July 2012 16:16, Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:39:37 -0500, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wr=
ote:
>
>> What sort of benchmarks do you envision?  Unlike named, unbound is
>> intended to serve only one client (localhost) or a small number of
>> clients (a SOHO).
>
>
> Highly disagree; we use it (ISP) as our resolving nameserver for all of o=
ur
> customers.

As Doug has pointed out, you can always get BIND from a port; not
every installation requires a heavyweight resolver.

Chris