From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Sep 18 12:10:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA29968
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 12:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.cityscape.co.uk (ns.cityscape.co.uk [194.159.0.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA29940;
          Wed, 18 Sep 1996 12:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.cityscape.co.uk (ns.cityscape.co.uk [194.159.0.5]) by ns.cityscape.co.uk (8.6.4/8.6.4) with SMTP id UAA12818; Wed, 18 Sep 1996 20:10:34 +0100
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 20:10:33 +0100 (BST)
From: Bernard Jauregui <bernard@cityscape.co.uk>
To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: Bernard Jauregui <bernard@cityscape.co.uk>,
        Douglas Reay <douglas@cityscape.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Postgres95 under FreeBSD 2.1.5R 
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.90.960918200637.28536N-100000@ns.cityscape.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Thanks to everyone who pointed out that Postgres95 required the SYS V 
messaging and memory options set in the kernel.

Unfortunately I had already though of that and they were present.

Any more suggestions, or do I need to move to FreeBSD 2.2 as Glen Foster 
suggests ? Hint : This would be a major pain :-)

Bernard