From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 13:34:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ED34C2 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zaphod@berentweb.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EE98FC08 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TW5lu-0001zY-7r for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 05:34:22 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 05:34:22 -0800 (PST) From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1352295262237-5758865.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: unionfs and NFS? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:34:23 -0000 I tried it with several jail setup scenarios. - it did not work, so I gave up on it. It's a nice concept, but as it states, it can be (and in my experience was) unrelaible. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/unionfs-and-NFS-tp5753281p5758865.html Sent from the freebsd-fs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.