From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 14:25:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7561D37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 14:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC73C43FBF for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 14:25:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 56168530E; Mon, 5 May 2003 23:25:47 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andrey A. Chernov" References: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> <20030501191027.GA53801@madman.celabo.org> <20030505110601.H53365@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20030505175426.GA19352@madman.celabo.org> <20030505205051.GA40572@nagual.pp.ru> <20030505212027.GA41263@nagual.pp.ru> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 23:25:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030505212027.GA41263@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey A. Chernov's message of "Tue, 6 May 2003 01:20:27 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 21:25:49 -0000 "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 23:05:15 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > > > Better reject such error automatically at the linkage stage. Programmers > > > are always free to redefine their functions in case of conflict. > > There must be something wrong with my MUA, as I can't see a patch > > attached to your message. Could you please resend it? > Which one do you mean? The patch that makes the linker produce warnings or errors like you suggested. You seemed so convinced it was the best solution that I figured you had to have a patch ready to commit. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org