From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 20:41:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8FA16A400 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenoternullo@virgilio.it) Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (vsmtp2.tin.it [212.216.176.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC3F13C45E for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenoternullo@virgilio.it) Received: from [87.20.167.250] (87.20.167.250) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.3.122) id 467668F000BF3209 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:41:04 +0200 Message-ID: <46817960.3010505@virgilio.it> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:38:56 +0200 From: Sereno Ternullo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46811D7B.5040809@virgilio.it> <443b0epnq3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <443b0epnq3.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Upgrading Xorg from 6.9.0 to 7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:41:06 -0000 Lowell Gilbert ha scritto: > Sereno Ternullo writes: > > >> Hi folks, >> I'm encountering problems upgrading Xorg from version 6.9.0 to 7.2 >> I followed the procedure described in /usr/ports/UPDATING >> >> [...] >> >> # portupgrade -aP -x 'gstreamer*' >> >> Even though my computer spent 24 hours compiling, >> when I typed >> >> # pkg_version -s xorg >> >> I saw I still had my old 6.9.0 version. >> >> So this morning I tried again, by typing: >> >> # script xorg.upgrade portupgrade -Pr xorg >> > > According to the directions, what you needed at that point was > "portupgrade -a". I would expect that to cover a lot more. > Did you try that command? > > Of course, in fact my computer spent 24 hours compiling :) P.S: Why so many ports and so few packages ?