From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 20 0:58:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F6737B407 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:58:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.19.129.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EA543E6E for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:58:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4F1C28666; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:58:01 +0700 (ALMST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9273828652; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:58:01 +0700 (ALMST) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:58:01 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov To: Jeff Roberson Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for review & testing of VFS locking patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote: > This patch touches every filesystem. I have tested with several but I > would appreciate more extensive testing especially if you use one of the > lesser used filesystems (ie non ufs). Please test with WITNESS and > DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS enabled. If you find that it drops into the debugger > please get a back trace and then do the following: Well, haven't tested it with smbfs, but may point that patch for nwfs contains two vref()s instead of vgetref(). -- Boris Popov http://rbp.euro.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message