From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 18 19:50:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFF416A409 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outW.internet-mail-service.net (outW.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EA513C44C for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:18:25 -0700 Received: from [10.251.22.38] (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED807125ADB; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4626767A.1050204@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:50:18 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: <4626741C.3010907@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4626741C.3010907@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nanobsd.sh change: configurable boot0 loader and configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:50:11 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Here's a simple patch to allow boot0 parameters to be configured. >> My test embedded boxes have a VGA console which I'd like to use during >> development/debugging. >> >> Comments? > NanoBSD is a PHK thing largely (I think) > I've used tinybsd (also in the repo) but not nanoBSD > > (try it it's quicker) :-) > sorry to -current.. I didn't realise that this was a generally readable message. (I thought it was just to me as Adrian and I are friends and we have a current mail exchange going on which I thought this was a part of). I did not mean to imply that NanoBSD was not good especially mot due to any PHK connection, just that I was not a good person to review his change and that maybe phk might be a better choice of reviewer. I only realised that his email was going to -current when I got my reply back through -current.. Sorry for the noise and especially I apologise to PHK if it looks as if I am saying that nanoBSD is not good because he is connected with it.. That was not what I meant to say at all.