From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 29 05:14:37 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F4D16A46D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from pinus.cc.fer.hr (pinus.cc.fer.hr [161.53.73.18])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE46413C459
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:14:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ivoras@fer.hr)
Received: from [161.53.72.113] (lara.cc.fer.hr [161.53.72.113])
	by pinus.cc.fer.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id l7R8UK3f028499;
	Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:30:22 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <46D28858.80901@fer.hr>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:16:24 +0200
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20060911)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com>
References: <fas4rs$ur$1@sea.gmane.org> <004f01c7e86a$b78088a0$268199e0$@com>
In-Reply-To: <004f01c7e86a$b78088a0$268199e0$@com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Repeated UFS panics?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:14:37 -0000

Jan Mikkelsen wrote:

> Is this an SMP or uniprocessor virtual machine?

SMP kernel on a UP VM.

> I see frequent "signal 11" failures from gcc when putting an SMP
> virtual machine under load.  The same load on a uniprocessor
> virtual machine works fine.  This is 6.2-STABLE;  I haven't tried
> -CURRENT.  VMware Server 1.0.3, AMD-X2, ECC memory, Windows XP
> 64-bit host.

My configuration is "plain" - 32-bit guest on a 32-bit WinXP host.

I'll add that I've been running 6.x in this way for a long time without 
problems (I think I even tried SMP VM one time with 6.x, but decided it 
was not worth it).