From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 20:38:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA19916A478 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 20:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4C313C4E5 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 20:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from phobos.samsco.home (phobos.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m18KChvf002808; Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:12:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <47ACB7BB.7090305@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:12:43 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071128 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce M. Simpson" References: <20080208185405.GA1479@roadrunner.spoerlein.net> <47ACAE62.2060706@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47ACAE62.2060706@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.4 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot0sio working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:38:48 -0000 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: >> So, is boot0sio supposed to just work with a cheap USB->RS232 dongle at >> the other end? I don't know how this paragraph from boot0cfg(8) is >> affecting me. >> > boot0sio is wholly dependent upon BIOS support for addressing the > on-board COM1 port. It is not intended (read: very unlikely) to work > with USB dongles. > > If your BIOS does not support the call that it uses, then the symptoms > will be similar to what you've seen. Unfortunately there is just not > enough space in the MBR to implement any workarounds for this. > Yeah, unless the BIOS provides traditional SIO emulation via USB (similar idea to providing tradition AT keyboard emulation via USB) then boot0sio won't work. It's not very feasible to put a USB stack into the early boot loader anyways. It's somewhat possible (at least, using a chained boot loader), but not very feasible. Scott