From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:22:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AE216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBCE43D31 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:22:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hawkeyd@visi.com) Received: from sheol.localdomain (hawkeyd-fw.dsl.visi.com [208.42.101.193]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2AA893D; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:21:54 -0600 (CST) Received: (from hawkeyd@localhost) by sheol.localdomain (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) id i0EILsK22465; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:21:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hawkeyd) X-Spam-Policy: http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/index.html#mail Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:21:54 -0600 From: D J Hawkey Jr To: Jesper Louis Andersen Message-ID: <20040114182154.GA22444@sheol.localdomain> References: <20040114134215.GA21307@sheol.localdomain> <20040114180931.GA17074@miracle.mongers.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114180931.GA17074@miracle.mongers.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: security at FreeBSD Subject: Re: mtree vs tripwire X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hawkeyd@visi.com List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:22:05 -0000 On Jan 14, at 07:09 PM, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote: > > > This might seem really naive, but can mtree be used effectively as > > a native-to-core-OS tripwire equivalent? Would it be as efficient in > > terms of time-to-run and resource requirements? > > Pro: distributed with base > Con: Only available for *BSD architectures as far as my knowledge goes. I'm aware of both, yes; hence my question. FreeBSD is all I'm dealing with, where my question is concerned. Is your reply from personal experience, or is it the same "Hey, it could..." as is my question? If the former, would you elaborate on the implementation details? Thanks, Dave -- ______________________ ______________________ \__________________ \ D. J. HAWKEY JR. / __________________/ \________________/\ hawkeyd@visi.com /\________________/ http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/