Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 Mar 2023 19:38:32 +0300
From:      Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org>
To:        janm@transactionware.com
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Possible regression in "make all-depends-list"
Message-ID:  <CALH631md9fW_DTLsxSqB5GHyUkyZj%2BfavM_%2BUkODxvuJuo3Y1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EE35107-6152-4144-AFBC-CBD61EECB1AF@transactionware.com>
References:  <3EE35107-6152-4144-AFBC-CBD61EECB1AF@transactionware.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 6:35=E2=80=AFPM Jan Martin Mikkelsen
<janm@transactionware.com> wrote:
>
> Running =E2=80=9Cmake all-depends-list=E2=80=9D on the hs-pandoc port sho=
ws none of the dependencies listed in the USE_CABAL variable in the Makefil=
e. In the 2022Q2 branch, these dependencies were included.

USE_CABAL dependencies aren't port dependencies. These deps are
compiled statically into the port, so from Ports Framework perspective
they are part of source files that make up the software being built.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631md9fW_DTLsxSqB5GHyUkyZj%2BfavM_%2BUkODxvuJuo3Y1g>