From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 16:28:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8EB16A4D8 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:28:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A21A43D5C for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:28:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 4251 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2004 16:28:18 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 16 Nov 2004 16:28:18 -0000 Received: from [10.50.41.235] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAGGRue7082873; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:28:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:05:43 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200411151424.49790.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <4199AEC8.1070608@marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <4199AEC8.1070608@marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411161105.43475.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net cc: Robert Watson Subject: Re: 6-CURRENT unbelievably slow? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:28:19 -0000 On Tuesday 16 November 2004 02:39 am, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > | On Thursday 11 November 2004 05:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > |>On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:39:09PM +0100, Alexander@Leidinger.net wrote: > |>>Zitat von Joe Marcus Clarke : > |>>>I noticed the interrupt storm detection line in dmesg. In previous > |>>>builds, this worked, but it doesn't seem to be taking effect anymore. > |>> > |>>AFAIK the interrupt storm detection was removed (at least partially). > |> > |>s/removed/fixed so it doesn't give so many false positives/ > |> > |>(at least partially) ;-) > |> > |>Talk to jhb.. > | > | Please try this patch out and let me know if it does any better: > > Yes, this patch makes a world of difference. The interrupt storm is > still there, but the ata0 (irq 14) rate is down to 1480 per second, and > the interrupt load is only ~2%. Thanks. Can you tweak it a bit and see if it works even better if you put an #if 0 around the lines that read: + if (count > hz) { + storming = 0; + count = 0; + } else + count++; -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org