From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 26 08:33:53 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA19814 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 08:33:53 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA19806 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 08:33:48 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id JAA25157; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 09:37:42 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 09:37:42 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199503261637.JAA25157@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" "Re: httpd as part of the system." (Mar 26, 5:29am) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" , hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > several people requested a copy of mosaic-2.5 for -current: > > > > freefall.cdrom.com:/incoming/mosaic-2.5.tgz > > > > this is stock mosaic 2.5 statically linked to motif 1.2, compiled > > on 2.0-950322-SNAP. > > > > I don't normally intrude into other people's legal affairs, but you're > in violation of the Motif 1.2 source license, unless you're collecting > Motif run-time royalties and sending them to OSF. Umm, the version of Motif that was sold by SwiM(??) explicitly made it possible that we could distribute binaries linked against it. This goes against what was mentioned on the newsgroup, but the CS dept. at MSU was very sure that they were completely free and legal to distribute binaries that were linked against the version of Motif they bought. It is version 1.2, and they did get written permission from the distributor. Nate