From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Dec 20 00:53:47 2017 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE54FE870AE for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA7C74044 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBK0rlSF013870 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:53:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223227] sysutils/logrotate doesn't correctly work after upgrading to 3.13.0 Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:53:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-223227-13-q4VC9l1Vyd@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-223227-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-223227-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:53:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223227 --- Comment #10 from Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to js from comment #8) The criteria for our new PR system were: - it had to be better than GNATS. - it had to be free and open-source. - it had to have some degree of community support (outside of FreeBSD). - it had to be better than the other alternatives that met the above. I wasn't involved in the Bugzilla installation, but I was involved in the previous round of discussions on how to replace it. The first one, everyone agreed on*. The second one and third ones, most pe= ople agreed on. The fourth one, everyone had their own opinions and the one was picked that the least number of people found objectionable. My own opinion after years of working on various PR systems is that they are all terrible. I also read the big caution "Do not write your own!" on one = web page as being a sad story from experience. (At one time I did try to customize a non-open-source alternative to our ne= eds: the effort failed.) So, while I understand that Bugzilla is frustrating to use, I honestly beli= eve we made the best decision possible at the time, given the resources we had. mcl * a low bar, to be sure. (In reply to js from comment #9) (In reply to js from comment #9) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=