From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  1 13:52:13 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957CB16A419
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E56613C480
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 13:52:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72642084;
	Mon,  1 Oct 2007 15:52:04 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441B92082;
	Mon,  1 Oct 2007 15:52:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 264B6844A4; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 15:52:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Dennis Berger <db@nipsi.de>
References: <4700A791.6020606@encephalon.de>
	<20071001091106.GB35764@garage.freebsd.pl>
	<4700BC65.1000303@encephalon.de> <4700BE80.5080109@encephalon.de>
	<4700C441.30100@nipsi.de> <861wcf82p3.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<4700E97A.1040704@nipsi.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:52:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4700E97A.1040704@nipsi.de> (db@nipsi.de's message of "Mon\, 01
	Oct 2007 14\:35\:06 +0200")
Message-ID: <86ve9r3ptn.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: zpool does not work
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:52:13 -0000

Dennis Berger <db@nipsi.de> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > Both patches in the PR are incorrect.  The second patch is better than
> > the first, but still gets the logic wrong and completely misses the
> > point of using an sbuf in the first place.
> I meant this one
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?prp=3D104389-3-diff

"still gets the logic wrong and completely misses the point of using an
sbuf in the first place"

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no