From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Feb  7 10:30: 4 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 15CB537B405; Thu,  7 Feb 2002 10:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from wkb@localhost)
	by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g17ITv819535;
	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:29:57 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from wkb)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:29:57 +0100
From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: How about gcj? (Re: Not committing WARNS settings...)
Message-ID: <20020207192957.B19376@freebie.xs4all.nl>
References: <20020206192238.B3347@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202070539.g175dbQ22609@aldan.algebra.com> <20020207101133.B53237@dragon.nuxi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20020207101133.B53237@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:11:33AM -0800
X-OS: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE
X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:11:33AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:39:35AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > I believe,  what I see.  And that is, FreeBSD  includes both --  gdb and
> > gcc, but only one libbfd, thankfully. And  I want to be able to use that
> > same libbfd  for my own development  and for porting of  other compilers
> > and tools.

...
 
> Sure some things are a problem.  GCC 2.95 generates bad optimized code on
> the Alpha.  Upgrading to 3.1 will fix [some of] this.  We cannot do a

To satisfy a bit of my curiosity:

- is GCC3 also better on Alpha as far as correctness of the generated
  code goes? Or is that what you mean by "bad optimised code" ?

- The gcc 2.95 compiler is quite a bit slower (it appears) on Alpha than
  on x86. Do you have any idea how gcc3 does in this respect?

Thanks!
Wilko

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		wilko@FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte		Arnhem, the Netherlands

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message