From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 18 20:04:28 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA29524 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:04:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from luke.cpl.net ([206.85.245.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA29519 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:04:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (shawn@localhost) by luke.cpl.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA00364; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:03:59 GMT Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:03:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Shawn Ramsey X-Sender: shawn@luke.cpl.net To: Ron Bickers cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Servers (single IP) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I guess if the user doesn't want to grow with the industry, that's their > choice, yes. I was simply saying, even if they COULD get to these > "IP-less" virtual domains, chances are it'd look like garbage. > > I use Lynx often myself and more often find I can't do what I need to > because of other features used on a web site and not supported. That's a > whole different issue though. I use Lynx a lot myself too, because for the most part it works well, and is functional enough on most web sites. The newer versions also support HTTP 1.1, so the ip'less domains will still work with Lynx. Mosaic 2.75 also works like this. If you are using Netscape 1.1, or Explorer >2.0, you are not to be helped anyway. :)