From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 26 11:30: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D909114C32 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id LAA02789; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909261830.LAA02789@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dan Moschuk Subject: Re: ports/13976: proftpd-1.2.0p6 port Reply-To: Dan Moschuk Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/13976; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dan Moschuk To: Dominik Rothert Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@hub.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/13976: proftpd-1.2.0p6 port Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:36:57 -0400 | >Description: | | I just noticed that after installing the proftpd-1.2.0p6 port, | there are '/usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf' and | '/usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf.default'. There's no difference between | these two files. Both are executable. (not needed IMHO). | '/usr/local/etc/proftpd.conf' is not listed in the PLIST. And should be this way, in my opinion. What happens when someone upgrades their version from the ports to find their configuration file removed and replaced with the default? -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dan@freebsd.org) "Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try." -- Yoda To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message