From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 21:39:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0394D5CA; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from minimarmot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AD18FC08; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so721341pbc.13 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:39:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QPcdpYY4ZvWj6dbYs2+vKEgOZHzXZaTZNFLBsbxAI+U=; b=YDM2bIfSlbChvtnUCps0FOEeWzUH0yLL2ItRTmnsQg2DEMlUreHpH3p3D7tgaX8ZA1 6afCFpXMpfUVYDqN41bkPv/2GyWjVqghbrNVE1j5fkIzRkf96wtSNWieqUv6KgyMqa41 4d+gWNS502CKm2RU1FhjeCb2HCAi9MFTNw9mKuFBmBCwUKR1/Y2qQh3MCbJjeRlBIHZL 4BX6IFe4Oepb98wMdDpVbJ5MGVDACl3DDXvwkPa2yN2Wu6vek/smRUxH17oUW+/t6RlP PWgCyNikIZeUvNY31eBTwYtEpCeASg6X5EYrsBIYGkdX4rd54IizvfoVIF/IDPBnZJ9M jbtQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.238.34 with SMTP id vh2mr82885595pbc.6.1352929192777; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.148.227 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:39:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201211140805.qAE85MHU031099@svn.freebsd.org> <50A364AE.6060205@freebsd.org> <20121114093236.GJ28213@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:39:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r243019 - head/sbin/route From: Ben Kaduk To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:39:59 -0000 On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 14 November 2012 11:12, Ben Kaduk wrote: >> Andre, they are used (for better or for worse) in a multi-site >> database synchronization protocol that currently works portably across >> operating systems. Removing them would change the semantics of that >> protocol in a subtle way that might introduce breakage. > > Which one? OpenAFS. In particular, the logic to determine the sychronization site for the ubik databases uses classful addressing. -Ben