From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 26 13:29:26 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF8A106566B
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:29:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0462C8FC0A
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:29:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org>) id 1R8BFN-00054C-6I
	for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:29:25 +0200
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:29:25 +0200
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:29:25 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:29:11 +0200
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <j5pun7$hb1$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <1108033999.20110921224848@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<20110922105105.GA1662@garage.freebsd.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enigCCCDF394FC0BB5C6AC8E07D1"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110907 Thunderbird/6.0.1
In-Reply-To: <20110922105105.GA1662@garage.freebsd.pl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Subject: Re: geom_fox vs geom_multipath?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:29:26 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigCCCDF394FC0BB5C6AC8E07D1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 22/09/2011 12:51, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:48:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
>> Hello, Freebsd-geom.
>>
>>   We have both geom_fox without control utility and strange way of
>> labelling and "conventional" geom_multipath.
>>
>>   They seems to perform same task, but geom_multipath looks like
>> "normal" module and geom_fox is very old one, before "rules" for
>> modules was settled (metadata in first sector, no control utility,
>> etc).
>>
>>   Is it intentional? :)
>=20
> The geom_fox class is more of an example GEOM class.

Should it be disconnected from the build? I don't think it's ever used
in practice...


--------------enigCCCDF394FC0BB5C6AC8E07D1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6AficACgkQldnAQVacBch7iwCgm/5IO7hY0+BpAc+OteQgeSc7
LLQAoI+N3daWlikSxsMv/p6jf5ptFYJA
=wAsU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigCCCDF394FC0BB5C6AC8E07D1--