From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 20 00:01:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06F1106564A for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2B68FC0C for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q3K01CBF003950 for ; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:01:15 -0600 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:01:08 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201204200701.08507.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Subject: Status on X220 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:01:24 -0000 Hi, there are so many different news about the X220 here that it is not so clear to me whether an install will result in a usable system. If everything works fine, there should be one for me tomorrow ready to get FreeBSD. My plan is to start with a plain 9.0 installation and upgrade it then to 10.0 before installing any ports. All I saw from the list is that 10.0 is the best option to get a usable system. Is there a better option? Erich