From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Aug 7 05:47:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA14007 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 05:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from connet80.com (connet80.connet80.com [199.2.214.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA13995 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 05:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from meljr@localhost) by connet80.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA00229; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 05:46:44 -0700 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 05:46:44 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mel Lester Jr." To: Peter Hawkins cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trial accounts In-Reply-To: <199608070010.KAA01174@rhiannon.clari.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk They are not a customer until they pay. Free trials are a marketing scheme that probably doesn't pencil out. People don't appreciate what they don't pay for and you would be better off giving them free on-site installation with a prepaid account. Give the first month's payment to the installer and keep 70% of your new customers for at least one year. The other 30% will move or leave you for other valid reasons that no one can control. What is a paying account worth over a year? How many free trial users actually convert to paying customers? -mel +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Mel Lester Jr. meljr@ConNet80.com - Operations Manager ConNet80 | | ConNet80 - PDX's Fast Lane on the Information SuperHighway | | Connect with ConNet80, it pays! http://www.ConNet80.com/~meljr | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ On Wed, 7 Aug 1996, Peter Hawkins wrote: > Hi fellow ISPers, > I'd like to gather some feelings about providing (perhaps restricted) "trial" > access to anyone who logs in (user=register). It's pretty common here but I > have steered away from it for two reasons: > > 1. security > 2. The potential for someone to dial in under that name indefinitely. > > However I don't want to lose custom :) so if there are ways of > addressing 1. and 2. I'd like to hear them. > > Peter >