Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:01:26 +0100
From:      John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
To:        Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r332606 - in head/lang/nqc: . files
Message-ID:  <5276AB96.4050301@marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <5276AA8C.5000205@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201311031137.rA3Bb32U043731@svn.freebsd.org> <20131103202949.41cbc7c6@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <5276A847.2030906@marino.st> <5276AA8C.5000205@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/3/2013 20:57, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 11/3/2013 1:47 PM, John Marino wrote:

> Couldn't you just change OSVERSION in dports' bsd.port.mk to be 999999?
> This would be much better than needing to update all ports. I'd say 99%
> or more of people are only considering FreeBSD when writing or
> maintaining ports.

That is exactly the current case.
However, that in no way fixes everything.
There are many cases where this is the wrong thing for DragonFly.

I never asked to update all the ports, but it would be nice not to
continue to add more of these without OPSYS.

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5276AB96.4050301>