From owner-cvs-all  Fri Aug 21 18:29:53 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA01192
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 18:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA01186;
          Fri, 21 Aug 1998 18:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca10-63.ix.netcom.com [205.186.214.63]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA13962; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 18:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id SAA13381; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 18:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 18:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199808220129.SAA13381@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
To: ache@nagual.pp.ru
CC: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <19980821171809.A29371@nagual.pp.ru> (ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick Makefile ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/files md5 ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/patches patch-aa ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * This question was not about _maintaing_ particular port but about port
 * _existence_ in whole ports structure, so scope is more wide than port
 * maintainer area.

It's still up to the maintainer.  I almost never override the
maintainer's decision to delete or keep a port.  At least not with
good reason.

Besides, it is just plain rude to delete the port without at least
asking the maintainer first.

Satoshi