From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 4 14:42:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA01735 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:42:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from set.scient.com (set.Scient.COM [208.29.209.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA01728 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:42:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enkhyl@scient.com) Received: by set.scient.com; (5.65v4.0/1.3/10May95) id AA12569; Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:42:23 -0800 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:42:15 -0800 (PST) From: Christopher Nielsen X-Sender: enkhyl@ender.sf.scient.com Reply-To: Christopher Nielsen To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSDi IPv6 (was: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec?) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > For the rest the set-up and configuring was a breeze just when it came to > userland tool flags it's confusing to use -ipv6 one time and -ip6 the next. > Hope this sort of thing can be avoided or standardized under FreeBSD... I think the goal is transparency to the user, i.e., use IPv6 when possible and IPv4 when necessary. Although, there will probably be cases where people will want to make this selection manually. -- Christopher Nielsen Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator cnielsen@scient.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message