From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 18:48:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEBC1065670; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960D48FC26; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 380ED46B09; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:48:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:48:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20090122.104114.1927899760.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: References: <200901220621.n0M6LU5v002745@svn.freebsd.org> <20090122.104114.1927899760.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, jeff@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187580 - head/tools/sched X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:48:05 -0000 On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200901220621.n0M6LU5v002745@svn.freebsd.org> > Jeff Roberson writes: > : Author: jeff > : Date: Thu Jan 22 06:21:30 2009 > : New Revision: 187580 > : URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187580 > : > : Log: > : - Update my copyright. > : +# Copyright (c) 2002-2003, 2009, Jeffrey Roberson > > Stylistically, this should be 2002-2009. We don't need to list each and > every year, so the project's policy is to list the earliest and the latest > year. > > See, for example, http://www.oppedahl.com/copyrights/ for the reasoning > behind this. FWIW, the one case where I don't really do that is when I worked on some code on my own and hence hold the copyright for it, then did some work under a contract for a customer on it such that they own the copyright on enhancements, and then I do some further work on my own. In that case, I'll leave a discontinuity to reflect the fact that the copyright on changes made in the gap were assigned elsewhere. Not clear this is the right thing to do, but I'm fairly sure at least some of my customers are more comfortable with that as it leaves no confusion in the source as to which bits they sponsored/own. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge