From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 06:46:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E829E16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:46:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E5A43D41 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) j236kdgP003098; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:46:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:46:39 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Andriy Tkachuk In-Reply-To: <000b01c51fbb$4189ea30$090210ac@BORJA> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for threads/76690 - critical - fork hang in child for -lc_r X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 06:46:41 -0000 On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Andriy Tkachuk wrote: > > > Is there a reason you are still using libc_r? > > I don't use it at all, but there was critical bug > i threads-pr - so i just decided to fix it since i > have had some time ) Oh, OK. > If this library is needless, why is it still there > and this pr in criticals? libc_r is marked for deprecation, but still used by some archs (sparc64 & alpha). Also, some folks want to use nvidia drivers/openGL and these aren't thread-safe with anything but libc_r. -- DE