Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:31:04 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <20031124203005.Y69870@pooker.samsco.home> In-Reply-To: <200311250321.hAP3L5dh076036@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200311250214.hAP2EctT019845@realtime.exit.com> <200311250321.hAP3L5dh076036@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :I supported the decision because: > : > :1. It has been requested for years > :2. It benefits PAM and NSS. > :3. It is easy to revert. > > Easy to revert? You are talking about depending on mechanisms for > authentication and other things that WILL NOT WORK with static binaries > as they currently stand and, apparently, will not work in the > future either. Easy to revert? I don't think so. > > More like "Lets do away with support for static binaries entirely". > Because that is precisely what is happening here. What the hell are you talking about????
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031124203005.Y69870>