From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 16:31:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2245E16A4CE; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:31:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B364E43D49; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i9RGV8Qh077962 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i9RGV8GV077961; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:08 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Message-ID: <20041027163108.GA77712@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <417FA785.2080600@veldy.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417FA785.2080600@veldy.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:31:09 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When do ports unfreeze now that 5.3 is tagged for RELEASE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:31:15 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 08:49:57AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > When do the ports get "unfrozen" now that FreeBSD 5.3 has been tagged as= =20 > RELEASE [via /usr/src/UPDATING]? There are several ports that I would=20 > like to see upgraded [like dspam] to the more recent levels and I have=20 > been told that they are waiting out the freeze. About two weeks ago... Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBf81MiD657aJF7eIRAhUNAJ9pQeKp8vrYxAGddeuFZ2sOUlHMywCePuKV 0yuS9s43dHEObCtTYbD0RbY= =KN3Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--