From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 19 7: 2: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.tcworks.net (ns.tcworks.net [216.61.218.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C611150F3 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 07:02:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ccook@tcworks.net) Received: from tcworks.net (xcess@creed.tcworks.net [216.61.218.6]) by ns.tcworks.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA88633; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:03:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ccook@tcworks.net) Message-ID: <37BD5F37.EDBA28AF@tcworks.net> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 08:59:19 -0500 From: Chris Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dsm , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (PM) Routing Problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >> that is not correct. > >> > >> see : > >> > >> http://www.livingston.com/tech/technotes/200/230005.html > > > > > >Is that "that is not correct" in response to Chris Cook, or in response to > >Nathan Middleton? Nathan's trying to get a PM3 to do this, but it seems > >that the document to which you refer doesn't mention the PM3. > > i was refering to the fact that he, the quoting person, was implying > that pm3 could not do frame, and it can, the aforementioned url syntax > works for pm3. lucinascendton should do some updating on their pages. > i have/had/will have many pm3's in service doing frame. i have heard > of issues surrounding timing, i think, when using line0, but i can't > corraborate that. have always used line1. > > - dsm I did not say the pm3 could not do frame, I just said I was under the impression that you needed to add the sync-t1 card (line2) to get it to work. -- Chris Cook The Computer Works http://www.tcworks.net http://www.tcworks.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message