Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:54:20 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Oleg Sharoyko <os@sfedu.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong outgoing interface with multiple routing tables Message-ID: <4A6E05EC.8050401@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4A6E0121.2020004@sfedu.ru> References: <1248704237.96833.127.camel@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <4A6DE356.6040006@elischer.org> <4A6DEE30.6000108@sfedu.ru> <4A6DFFA1.1010709@elischer.org> <4A6E0121.2020004@sfedu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleg Sharoyko wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> does it still fail if you run it in foreground mode (no daemonizing)? > > Yes. I actually test sshd in foreground mode (-D tells sshd to not go > into background). I have also checked a very simple client/server where > server called setsockopt(SO_SETFIB, 1) and got the same results. > > -- > Oleg great.. in your simple server, can you do the sockopt on the socket AFTER you did the listen()? (just as a test).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A6E05EC.8050401>