From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 15:32:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAE41075D5D for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C237F07A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w7DFWf24037669; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:32:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w7DFWeK0037668; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:32:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201808131532.w7DFWeK0037668@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Curent Centos 7 and bhyve In-Reply-To: <20180813020412.GA83165@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> To: Victor Sudakov Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:32:40 -0700 (PDT) CC: Shawn Webb , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:32:53 -0000 > Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > [dd] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Though it has a lot of features, it also has some short comings, > > > > > > like you can not spec a vm to be wired in memory, which IMHO is > > > > > > the only way to insure consistent VM performance. > > > > > > > > > > Well, we have "bhyve_options" configuration option in the vm config, > > > > > why not put "-S" there, is that what you mean by wiring the vm in > > > > > memory? > > > > > > > > I believe that fails as that only adds the -S to bhyve, and > > > > you must specify it both on bhyveload and bhyve for it to > > > > work. > > > > > > I think it is totally doable becase vm-bhyve is nothing but a suit of > > > scripts. A PR with a feature request would be appropriate. > > > > I made several attempts to contact the author at the email address > > provided at the git hub while making other bhyve changes to try > > and coordinate with him. I got no response after 3 attempts, > > so have stopped trying to contact them. (This was while I was > > adding the -c cpu topology modifications.) > > You can add yourself to > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230580 > maybe something useful comes out of it. I added virtualization@ to the PR, though it looks as if wired_memory= has already been added as an option, which is what I did locally. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org