From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 4 13:48:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD89C16A4E2 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E0D43D45 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:48:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24131 invoked from network); 4 Jul 2006 13:48:21 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jul 2006 13:48:21 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8D43C28449; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:48:20 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <44A7A0B8.8050109@netfence.it> <44bqs6n9c2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44A987F2.2060906@netfence.it> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:48:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44A987F2.2060906@netfence.it> (Andrea Venturoli's message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:11:14 +0200") Message-ID: <44d5clwkez.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: Snapshot problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 13:48:22 -0000 Andrea Venturoli writes: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >>> I believe the first one is a known problem, any more info? >>> >>> Any hint on the second? >> >> Not really; seems strange. >> >> Are you able to fsck the snapshot? > > Hm... guess so. > > Is it "fsck /var/local/snapmnt"? Assuming that is the snapshot file itself, pretty much right. You will need a "-t ffs" in the command as well, and to save time I'd recommend a "-n" also. > Just a question before I try it... this is a production system, will > it screw up anything? No; that's why I suggested fsck'ing the snapshot instead of the real filesystem.