From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Oct 18 11:16:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA13229 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 11:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from capella.grayphics.com (root@capella.grayphics.com [207.71.216.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA13222 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 11:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nick@localhost) by capella.grayphics.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id LAA28440; Fri, 18 Oct 1996 11:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 11:15:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Nick Esborn To: Kevin Quinlan cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mb/s ethernet and FreeBSD 2.1.5 In-Reply-To: <523.9610181626@ferrari.isltd.insignia.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 18 Oct 1996, Kevin Quinlan wrote: > So would anyone be prepared to recommend a solution for me that gives > me the best performance possible with FreeBSD 2.1.5, at 100Mb/s but > also good performance at 10Mb/s. I have had nothing but good luck with the Digital Fast Etherworks card, which is based on their own chipset. I have seen VERY fast ftp transfers with that card, and it has never given me any problems. Nick Grayphics http://www.grayphic.com/