From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Aug 18 8:10:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1FE37B443 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 08:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id IAA73536; Fri, 18 Aug 2000 08:10:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 08:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200008181510.IAA73536@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jon Schneider Subject: Re: gnu/20674: Dreadful tar performance with remote device Reply-To: Jon Schneider Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR gnu/20674; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jon Schneider To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: gnu/20674: Dreadful tar performance with remote device Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:06:44 +0100 I've tested the packaged gnu tar 1.13 and that's about the same. I tried switching the tcp.delayed_ack sysctl to 0 and that seems to cure the problem. However it is still faster doing the rsh bit manually than letting tar do it. Jon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message