From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 23 12:36: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (bronx-ip-3-115.dynamic.ziplink.net [205.208.98.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C4737B56D for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 12:35:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by aldan.algebra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00475; Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:33:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200007231933.PAA00475@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: No /boot/loader (dangerously dedicated) In-Reply-To: from Doug White at "Jul 22, 2000 09:47:23 pm" To: Doug White Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 15:33:43 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Thomas Stromberg , stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Wait! Smarter then what? So it can boot NT and Win98 for some => weenies, or, actually do something useful (not sure what, though)? => Why am I to waste space (even so little) "to be compatible with other => OSes", if there will never be any other OSes? = =So you'll be compatible with your BIOS as well. Many BIOSen get really, =really torqued if your partition table isn't normal. I'm yet to see a BIOS, for which this is true. May be, I'm just lucky... =It's a negligible amount of space. Just say 'Yes'. :) Althouh, I'm delighted to see my opinion matter so much :), I don't see the benefit. Making the loader smarter? To do what? To play some silly animations, while loading kernel? No thanks... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message