From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 9 10:14:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738711479EC for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46p96v2Bjgz4DC4; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1627A12D2F; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D27653329B; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:14:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:14:13 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jan Beich Cc: Yasuhiro KIMURA , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <20191009101412.lwxyqcdaqtsvq2ym@ivaldir.net> References: <20191007.151841.1094708479149685365.yasu@utahime.org> <8spu-p72a-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w77b3rggzg4kmuoo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8spu-p72a-wny@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 10:14:15 -0000 --w77b3rggzg4kmuoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:05:49PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > Yasuhiro KIMURA writes: >=20 > > On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by > > default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate > > IPV6 options by default everywhere". > > > > And now we are in 2019. IPv6 is more widely used than 2012. So I > > wonder if IPV6 option is still necessary. >=20 > ipv6 in CATEGORIES is also of dubious value nowadays. For one, > www/firefox has "ipv6" while www/chromium does not. This one is even easier to fix ;) Best regards, Bapt --w77b3rggzg4kmuoo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl2dsuAACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlrX0Q//WH3XljwMKcxo0wTGdTuA8wWVTW06u4/DeWizIXvBFtIRs4/f1ICaIIzh JH8ZfTClGOFqj/W53+I0RrYY19kxECdH+cfdXXMVnfR+Cetja1sqM07LqqJzSHyt iZ6P6Y0S1VfgqmyEo+KJkyU9jIVjyRAIb0+ymee1/dn7SibE45kahgNHGhmUDTGG cVkUm+tnoWkMHhZ75Lavd00Xu1PE+3JnXZ35lkEvmFcgTZwQPYECRvmmT+G51eEZ Axi8gLHJyPRCORughlKa9Vs8QxTWFQS1ySxRjfoSxAyaidIdobZAqEn33B/RBsJ9 qbqpBjnWRWZdtvjEGpoNXhik0nhBSAuWDqS9wUpEyIDrLaY9E92sKW90eKmeQuN2 eE2cHCPh6DwGfd041o0hwk0ceP4n093wt3h/C6pW9ot6BSrCLvm3ykfgCPZnNh+L ZGyCMRGw3Zuu36/CFnkY+TVM/GAYOjPf8lZrVIdcWezMb+x0f2ck/I0LhSez3oYJ HiPqKnrJLRbzMSVKu/0WEVPlTFP5mgqHrpC5zG44a8PC3gHFKxn6dQ4n0Gfdv56U yw0OAZg5e8jtPbuaQpmTJMgjZ8xXv3iG++GijQTg8XAWtWRUVJQSg9rKieuruX7V AHqVd86HKQh+xN/Hha3kk+PgOv2M/nqPO8BUvgZO437+4473sfw= =tpl9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w77b3rggzg4kmuoo--