From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Jan 23 18:07:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8626FEBD94E for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C06A635BD for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6097B6E32 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w0NI7W10014496 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w0NI7W3x014484 for freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214864] [exp-run] test build with lld as /usr/bin/ld Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: exp-run? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:07:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214864 --- Comment #101 from Ed Maste --- > After -CURRENT upgraded LLD 6.0 only aarch64 needs LLD 5.0 fixes unless F= reeBSD > 11.2 would skip it. I don't fully follow what you mean here - we'll have lld 5.0 by default in = 11.1 arm64; 11.2 will have either 5.0 or 6.0. But either way I want to have a working lld in 11 even for non-default cases. If the comment is around the fact that some ports may have LLD_UNSAFE set w= hen not needed (if they're unsafe for lld 5.0 but work for 6.0) I think it's a minor issue. Once we update the minimum base versions used for ports builds= we can revisit and make a pass over the ports tree to see if LLD_UNSAFE annotations can be removed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=