From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jan 25 2: 0: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B2937B416 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 02:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0PA02j30842; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 02:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 02:00:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201251000.g0PA02j30842@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: conf/31358: Updated patch for -CURRENT Reply-To: Thomas Quinot Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/31358; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Thomas Quinot To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/31358: Updated patch for -CURRENT Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:51:18 +0100 Le 2002-01-25, Sheldon Hearn écrivait : > Now that I'm actually looking at committing this... what on earth is > 'sysctl -r'? :-) Hum, puzzling one indeed. this must have been a thinko that nobody noticed before. I do not know how it could possibly have worked (this is quite odd because I generated the diffs from /etc/rc.network on the freshly rebooted machine). Anyway, it was present only in the old version of the patch, not in the current one (http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/31358.diff), which is exactly identical to the one posted to -audit. Thomas. -- Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message