From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 17 20:16:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8265216A420 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:16:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rainer.groesslinger@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94DED43D45 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:16:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rainer.groesslinger@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 20:16:26 -0000 Received: from 111-57-124-83.dsl.3u.net (EHLO [192.168.1.3]) [83.124.57.111] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2006 21:16:26 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5893105 Message-ID: <43F62F36.9060600@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:16:54 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rainer_Gr=F6=DFlinger?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <200602171829.04459.rainer.groesslinger@gmx.net> <20060217181022.GB16284@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <20060217181022.GB16284@soaustin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: lang/{*pnet*, treecc, libjit} update request X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:16:28 -0000 The ports are straight forward and all the checks etc. in them are for specific architectures I can't test (like sparc64) - so I don't think I'd be any help as it would only be a simple version bump + architecture testing for those things which are currently not enabled. Someone with access to those architectures and commit access to the ports needs to look at this. All I could do is submit a diff with one change: version number ;-) Rainer Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 06:29:04PM +0100, Rainer Größlinger wrote: >> Would be cool if someone could take care of these packages. > > If you're using them, you are currently the most logical choice :-) > > mcl > >