Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Jun 2002 02:44:00 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-arch@FreeBSD.org, msmith@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Adding SO_NOSIGPIPE to -STABLE/-CURRENT
Message-ID:  <20020617094400.GJ67925@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020614022304.94570.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
References:  <20020614022304.94570.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> [020613 19:24] wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 	I would like you to review this proposal to add
> the socket option SO_NOSIGPIPE: "Do not issue SIGPIPE on EPIPE."
> Therefore, we can disable SIGPIPE on a per socket basis instead of
> completing ignoring it with either sigpromask(2) or signal(3)
> handling.

Thanks for taking the time to present this.  I'm going to try to
make it an fcntl option instead (so that it can be applied to most
descriptor types.)  I should have it committed within a couple of
days.

thanks,
-Alfred

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020617094400.GJ67925>