Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:54:41 -0600 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xfree4 by default? Message-ID: <20020102125441.Y16101@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <3C334C5A.A5E56055@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:07:22AM -0800 References: <20011231183928.F37696@bsd.havk.org> <78699.1009878927@winston.freebsd.org> <200201021425.g02EPks11288@dungeon.home> <3C334C5A.A5E56055@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> [020102 12:07] wrote: > Stephen McKay wrote: > > >It wouldn't be that hard in sysinstall either, depending on how > > >the X bits are packaged. FWIW, I also think that XFree86 4.x's time > > >has come. > > > > None of my current video cards work properly with 3.3.6, so I'm all for > > adding 4.1.0 immediately, rather than post release. Any chance? > > Yeah. > > Why isn't "X" a _package_ instead of a weird-ass tarball? I don't know! Maybe it's how the Xfree people distribute it? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020102125441.Y16101>