From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 19:58:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF5537B401; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-150.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0CB43FAF; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:58:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DB766D16; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55CDF113E; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:58:46 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tim Robbins Message-ID: <20030410025846.GA73994@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030408174535.CA3285D07@ptavv.es.net> <200304100239.h3A2dLLo072238@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030410124959.A92534@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410124959.A92534@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd@jobeus.net cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: 'for' unexpected. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 02:58:48 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:49:59PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: > I'm interested and puzzled at why this is happening -- /bin/sh itself hasn't > changed for the past 3 weeks. In the 3 weeks before that, about 4 lines of > code were changed. I suspect a bug in libc or a bug in one of the tools that > generates the shell's parsing code (awk, sed, etc.). Didn't someone say it was a libc bug? Kris --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+lN3mWry0BWjoQKURAtM2AJ9TuzWYf2SSQbkrMJex4a9wURDBEQCfVsjn o+KRGUbd9FDJ/QtIB11nE50= =wpPA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--