From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 9 13:47:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E95B106566B; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3618FC4B; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 243531CD18; Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:47:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:47:24 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: Takahashi Yoshihiro Message-ID: <20090809134724.GX1292@hoeg.nl> References: <4A7DF076.4070203@FreeBSD.org> <20090809.202549.27838630.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82NP6SxOLIStdcnZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090809.202549.27838630.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: mav@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do we still need ATA disk CHS addressing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:47:26 -0000 --82NP6SxOLIStdcnZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote: > In article <4A7DF076.4070203@FreeBSD.org> > Alexander Motin writes: >=20 > > While preparing wrapping ATA(4) low-level drivers code into CAM SIM, I > > would like to remove CHS addressing support to make code cleaner. CHS > > addressing is officially declared obsoleted and replaced by LBA. Since > > ATA/ATAPI-6 specification (October 2001) it is even no longer > > documented. > >=20 > > Have anybody seen ATA drive without LBA support in last years? > > Any other objections against removing it? >=20 > PC98 uses CHS addressing because the internal interface works for very > old HDD only, so I hope it remains if possible. But if you need a lot > of works for CHS support, I agree to remove it. Wouldn't it be possible to keep the old ATA code in the tree for users who want to use stuff like this? --=20 Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ --82NP6SxOLIStdcnZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkp+02sACgkQ52SDGA2eCwX+WgCfUg1hvFE15FXG3FU/VQz+khir ks4An2iOA1oAzUKd2O+oGONmX0hGacCM =xRVr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82NP6SxOLIStdcnZ--