From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 27 16:34:18 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87156106574B
	for <performance@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:34:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from david@catwhisker.org)
Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (m209-73.dsl.rawbw.com [198.144.209.73])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596A08FC12
	for <performance@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:34:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9RGYHwc016443
	for <performance@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org)
Received: (from david@localhost)
	by albert.catwhisker.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o9RGYH63016442
	for performance@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from david)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:34:17 -0700
From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To: performance@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20101027163417.GI9443@albert.catwhisker.org>
References: <20101021215330.GA86224@dan.emsphone.com>
	<20101021224237.GG52404@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<4CC6C396.1010905@freebsd.org>
	<20101026174501.GH2262@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<ia8srt$th0$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20101027105506.GD9443@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<ia9137$gag$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<20101027111904.GF9443@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<ia9263$kkd$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<201010271546.o9RFkRQn046373@lava.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RwxaKO075aXzzOz0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201010271546.o9RFkRQn046373@lava.sentex.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Possible evidence of performance regression for 8.1-S (vs. 7.1)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:34:18 -0000


--RwxaKO075aXzzOz0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>=20
> I did some very simple numbers to compare RELENG_7 and RELENG_8=20
> i386....  But cpu and=20
> memory driven tests all seem to be about the same and the disk io=20
> differences are pretty small.
> ...

This is good to know, but please note that what I was testing and
reporting was:

* release/7.1.0, with the following merged in:
  r186860 from stable/7
  r190970 from stable/7
  r203072 from head
  r209964 from stable/7
  and using the MAC kernel config

* stable/8 @r214029 using the GENERIC kernel config

Peace,
david
--=20
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

--RwxaKO075aXzzOz0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzIVIkACgkQmprOCmdXAD1rAACcDWLy5svJfo4Vnex+HIdQtJqe
occAn1DJSgadHSgj4//wKmhr1appmsRi
=Fcnw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RwxaKO075aXzzOz0--